Publication

Article

Oncology Live®

December 2010
Volume11
Issue 12

Media's Cancer Reporting Confuses Patients

Author(s):

A North Carolina State University study takes the US media to task for writing articles on cancer that use ambiguous terms and increase patients' uncertainty

A North Carolina State University study takes the US media to task for writing articles on cancer that use ambiguous terms and increase patients’ uncertainty. A review of 800 cancer-related news articles on Google News, Yahoo! News, CNN.com, and MSNBC.com found that nearly two-thirds contained terminology conveying probability rather than certainty about prevention, diagnosis, or treatment. As examples, the researchers cited the phrases “There is no evidence” and “it may even worsen patient’s chances.” The authors said the study is noteworthy because >100 million Americans use the Internet to find health information.

Related Videos
Andrew Ip, MD
Mansi R. Shah, MD
Elizabeth Buchbinder, MD
Benjamin Garmezy, MD, assistant director, Genitourinary Research, Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Alec Watson, MD
3 experts are featured in this series.
Sangeetha Venugopal, MD, MS, discusses factors that inform JAK inhibitor selection in myelofibrosis.
Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, MD, and Samuel Yamshon, MD, break down the current treatment landscape for relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma.
2 experts in this video