Single Agent I/O Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory

EP: 1.First-Line Therapy in ES SCLC: IMpower133

EP: 2.First-Line Therapy in ES SCLC: CASPIAN

EP: 3.First-Line Therapy in ES SCLS: KEYNOTE-604

EP: 4.Treatment Considerations: Chemotherapy + IO in ES SCLC

EP: 5.Future Directions in ES SCLC

EP: 6.Treatment After Progression of SCLC: Lurbinectedin

Now Viewing

EP: 7.Single Agent I/O Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory

EP: 8.SCLC: Second-Line Options and Supportive Care

EP: 9.SCLC: Rechallenging With Chemotherapy + I/O

EP: 10.Emerging Treatments in SCLC: Bispecific Antibodies

EP: 11.Emerging Treatments in SCLC: Targeting DNA Damage

EP: 12.Emerging Treatments in SCLC: Triplets + Limited-Stage Disease

EP: 13.Emerging Treatments in SCLC: Impact of Targeted Therapy

EP: 14.Future Directions in Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Hossein Borghaei, DO, MS: Anne, we heard about the withdrawal of approval of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in relapsed disease. These were voluntary withdrawals by both BMS [Bristol Myers Squibb] and Merck regarding these 2 drugs. What’s your take on that?

Anne Chiang, MD, PhD: It’s interesting if you learned from the withdrawal of pembrolizumab and nivolumab and think a little about lurbinectedin and see what’s going to happen. The pembrolizumab trial had 83 patients, and the overall response rate was 19%. The nivolumab trial had 109 patients, and the overall response rate was 12%. The FDA approvals were withdrawn because in the case of the larger phase 3 randomized trials of nivolumab, the BMS CheckMate 451 was negative. And for pembrolizumab, the KEYNOTE-604 trial was essentially negative statistically, even though there may have been a signal there.

What’s going to happen with lurbinectedin? I’m not sure. That’s also a small trial. It does have a better overall response rate. I’m not sure what’s going to happen. That being said, every oncologist, including me, has a story of a patient who did extremely well with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor. There’s no doubt that this is a useful tool in our armamentarium for our patients, especially those who can no longer tolerate chemotherapy. That was really the discussion in the NCCN [National Comprehensive Cancer Network] small cell guidelines group, which ultimately voted to keep both of these drugs in the NCCN Guidelines—although as a category 3, which indicates some discordance in the consensus. They’re options for our patients who can’t tolerate chemotherapy or have a good performance status and can still be treated. Because we all know a patient who’s done well on these kinds of therapies, it’s complex.

Hossein Borghaei, DO, MS: Let’s get this out of the way. Topotecan’s name has come up a couple of times. We all know topotecan represents a drug that none of us would like to use, but it’s also interesting that even our best drugs so far have not been able to beat topotecan in head-to-head comparison. It remains an FDA-approved approach for patients with refractory small cell lung cancer.

TRANSCRIPT EDITED FOR CLARITY