Video

Single Agent I/O Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory

Lung cancer expert Anne Chiang, MD, PhD, considers the recent withdrawal of FDA-accelerated approval for nivolumab and pembrolizumab for patients with relapsed extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Hossein Borghaei, DO, MS: Anne, we heard about the withdrawal of approval of nivolumab and pembrolizumab in relapsed disease. These were voluntary withdrawals by both BMS [Bristol Myers Squibb] and Merck regarding these 2 drugs. What’s your take on that?

Anne Chiang, MD, PhD: It’s interesting if you learned from the withdrawal of pembrolizumab and nivolumab and think a little about lurbinectedin and see what’s going to happen. The pembrolizumab trial had 83 patients, and the overall response rate was 19%. The nivolumab trial had 109 patients, and the overall response rate was 12%. The FDA approvals were withdrawn because in the case of the larger phase 3 randomized trials of nivolumab, the BMS CheckMate 451 was negative. And for pembrolizumab, the KEYNOTE-604 trial was essentially negative statistically, even though there may have been a signal there.

What’s going to happen with lurbinectedin? I’m not sure. That’s also a small trial. It does have a better overall response rate. I’m not sure what’s going to happen. That being said, every oncologist, including me, has a story of a patient who did extremely well with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor. There’s no doubt that this is a useful tool in our armamentarium for our patients, especially those who can no longer tolerate chemotherapy. That was really the discussion in the NCCN [National Comprehensive Cancer Network] small cell guidelines group, which ultimately voted to keep both of these drugs in the NCCN Guidelines—although as a category 3, which indicates some discordance in the consensus. They’re options for our patients who can’t tolerate chemotherapy or have a good performance status and can still be treated. Because we all know a patient who’s done well on these kinds of therapies, it’s complex.

Hossein Borghaei, DO, MS: Let’s get this out of the way. Topotecan’s name has come up a couple of times. We all know topotecan represents a drug that none of us would like to use, but it’s also interesting that even our best drugs so far have not been able to beat topotecan in head-to-head comparison. It remains an FDA-approved approach for patients with refractory small cell lung cancer.

TRANSCRIPT EDITED FOR CLARITY

Related Videos
Alec Watson, MD
Balazs Halmos, MD
Balazs Halmos, MD
Suresh Senan, MRCP, FRCR, PhD, full professor, treatment and quality of life, full professor, cancer biology and immunology, full professor, radiation oncology, professor, clinical experimental radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Alison Schram, MD
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses molecular testing challenges in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the multidisciplinary management of NRG1 fusion–positive non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of pathologists in molecular testing in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the role of RNA and other testing considerations for detecting NRG1 and other fusions in solid tumors.
Mary B. Beasley, MD, discusses the prevalence of NRG1 fusions in non–small cell lung cancer and pancreatic cancer.