Updates in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

EP: 1.Updates in Multiple Myeloma in the Frontline Setting

Now Viewing

EP: 2.Updates in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma

EP: 3.Third and Subsequent Line Options for Multiple Myeloma

Important considerations regarding the sequencing of IMid–versus–PI-based approaches for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma based on updates presented at the ASH 2020 Virtual Meeting.

Data from the following presentations are discussed:

• Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Efficacy and Safety Results of the Phase 3 CANDOR study. (Dimopoulos, ASH 2020 Abstract 2325)

  • Carfilzomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab Versus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Subgroup Analysis of the Phase 3 CANDOR Study in Patients With Early or Late Relapse. (Weisel, ASH 2020 Abstract 2287)

  • Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negativity in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Treated in the CANDOR Study. (Landgren, ASH 2020 Abstract 2282)

• Isatuxumab Plus Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone vs Carfilzomib and Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (IKEMA): Interim Analysis of a Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label Study. (Moreau, ASH 2020 Abstract 2316)

• APOLLO: Phase 3 Randomized Study of Subcutaneous Daratumumab Plus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (D-Pd) Versus Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone (Pd) Alone in Patients (Pts) with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM). (Dimopoulos, ASH 2020 Abstract 412)

• A Randomized Phase II, Open Label, Study of Daratumumab, Weekly Low-Dose Oral Dexamethasone and Cyclophosphamide With or Without Pomalidomide in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma. (Sebag, ASH 2020, Abstract 413)