News

Video

Chronic GVHD Incidence and Risk Factors

Dr Gooptu discusses the incidence of chronic GVHD and ruminates on how a patient’s medical history may impact their chronic GVHD risk.

Transcript:
Bonnie J. Dirr, APRN:
What percentage of allo transplant patients are diagnosed with chronic graft-vs-host disease [GVHD]? I know you briefly discussed this earlier, but if you could highlight that for us at this moment for chronic graft-vs-host disease, that would be helpful.

Mahasweta Gooptu, MD: Sure. With tacrolimus and methotrexate, the registry numbers are in the 40% to 45% range for mild, moderate, or severe forms of chronic GVHD, while the severe forms themselves are about 10% of all of those who get chronic GVHD. This has changed quite dramatically with posttransplant cyclophosphamide; while the rates of grade 2 to 4 acute GVHD are not affected really by PT-Cy, the rates of severe acute GVHD are in the 6% to 8% range and the rates of severe chronic GVHD are in the 5% to 6% range, and the rates of moderate to severe chronic GVHD are much lower, maybe in the 20% to 25% range with fully matched donors, perhaps a little higher with haploidentical donors. A very significant change in chronic GVHD with the use of cyclophosphamide, and it mirrors the numbers if you use bone marrow product.

Bonnie J. Dirr, APRN: Thank you. When we think about, what is it that we are looking for with our patients when we are having them come in for their follow-up visits, it sounds like a very good history is also very important in terms of taking that information from our patients as well as looking at signs and symptoms for the chronic graft-vs-host disease. Because it can be subtle notations that the patients bring to us that often are the presenting factors that make us dive a little bit more into, say, a physical exam. Would that not be accurate?

Mahasweta Gooptu, MD: Oh, for sure. A good history is invaluable in diagnosing chronic GVHD, and a physical exam to corroborate your findings on history. It may not show up on any diagnostic test. A good clinical evaluation is necessary to make the diagnosis.

Bonnie J. Dirr, APRN: Yes. Thank you. What factors are shown to demonstrate higher risk for patients developing chronic graft-vs-host disease? In chronic graft-vs-host disease, what are the main challenges identifying patients early on? It’s a quite a bit of information there. Let’s break this down. What are some of the shown higher risks for patients in developing chronic graft-vs-host disease?

Mahasweta Gooptu, MD:Some of the factors would be the use of a mismatched donor, the use of [total body irradiation]…in the conditioning regimen, the use of older donors, the use of peripheral blood stem cells rather than bone marrow product. Of course, the GVHD prophylaxis regimen used greatly influences the rates of acute and chronic GVHD.

Bonnie J. Dirr, APRN: Thank you very much for bringing us back and highlighting some of those other factors for us.

Transcript is AI-generated and edited for clarity and readability.

Related Videos
3 experts are featured in this series.
2 experts in this video
2 experts in this video
Ashkan Emadi, MD, PhD
Javier Pinilla, MD, PhD, and Talha Badar, MBBS, MD, discuss factors that influence later-line treatment choices in chronic myeloid leukemia.
Javier Pinilla, MD, PhD, and Talha Badar, MBBS, MD, on the implications of the FDA approval of asciminib in newly diagnosed CP-CML.
Duvelisib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma
2 experts in this video